HOME | DD
xxxecil — Sexist Drivel - 23
Published: 2010-09-17 05:17:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 4564; Favourites: 42; Downloads: 181
Redirect to original
Description
New issues most Fridays... sometimes.This edition also contains a secret.
Previous Drivel!
Next Drivel!
Related content
Comments: 17
I'm sorry, but I can't let this go. These 'women' are freaking mutants. I don't care if you want to draw cheesecake pinups posing as a comic, but at least make an ATTEMPT to get the anatomy right. And no, I'm not talking about the oversized tits and ass. In the top panel her (obviously traced) face is turned, but not the rest of her head, it's freaky. In the bottom panel, she's got quite the little package between her legs there, are you sure she's a woman? Also, necks do not behave like that, particularly the bottom panel. And the feet, oh man, the feet.... they must be broken to be in that position. It makes the entire thing utterly un-sexy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There there, let it all out. It's alright to be a lesbian in today's culture. You don't have to cover up your true desires by being snippy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not a lesbian (not that there's anything wrong with that) I'm being honest. the anatomy sucks, you need to work on it. It needs more than boobs to be sexy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Don't resist the truth any longer; admit how aroused you are and embrace your Sapphic yearnings.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Is this seriously all you can come up with? man, you're pathetic. How, exactly, does me saying these women are NOT sexy make me a lesbian? I realize you're just a sad little troll, but seriously, I was hoping for something with a bit more punch. I may have been snarky because you were being an immature tool with JTS12, but the critique was valid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I suppose I could say that your own characters look as though someone shoved a football inside their skulls. Your overly-thick lineart obscures the depth of your images, and often there is too much space between the eyes. Take a look at your own anatomy. And that critique is just as valid as your own unasked-for slurs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yeah. I'm sure anyone would consider any flaws in my art to be on par with this mess, that some eyes that are too far slightly too far apart is on par with a HEAD THAT HAS THE FACE ON THE SIDE. riiiiiight.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes frankly, your slope-headed avatar you show to everyone looks like a neanderthal after a head-on collision. Get your own house in order before you attack other people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's a stylistic choice. I chose to do it that way, and I am proud of it. I know what a realistic head looks like and can draw one, I chose not to. You can't honestly tell me you intended to draw a woman's face on the side of her head. You are attempting to bend the rules before having learned what the rules are. There is a vast difference between stylistic choice and mistakes. You are free to not like my style, but that doesn't make them mistakes. And I will GLADLY accept critique from someone who can't draw, I frequently do. If only people with flawless art could critique, no one would be able to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you have an honest critique, you can be respectful about it. But when someone who refuses to draw realistically tells my I need to draw more realistically, my instinct is to tell them to go fuck themselves.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hot chicks as always, but man, you make it worthwhile to actually read what they're talking about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Huh... that sounds like a development in robotics equal parts unnerving and handy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
