HOME | DD

GodDragonKing [2013-01-16 14:57:14 +0000 UTC]

So this is land theft?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shinobigarth [2011-11-13 05:32:08 +0000 UTC]

i like it, but i also think it doesnt need a U, 3GGG would be fine, or 4GG if you prefer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PMiller1 [2011-10-05 19:05:25 +0000 UTC]

GBU or UGR?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

theUNDEADSHARK [2011-10-05 13:18:48 +0000 UTC]

Personally, i would go with 4GG, blue just doesn't fit for me. All i can think of is Jace trying to command a tree with his mind. I can see why you added blue, you are taking over someone's land but, lands don't have minds to control.

Great job either way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShdwStalker [2011-10-05 06:48:41 +0000 UTC]

Wording needs a little work:
Enchanted land is a 4/5 green Treefolk creature. It's still a land.

Adding that it's only a green treefolk as long as the enchantment is attached to it isn't necessary. The only question remaining, is it still a land or not? I'm assuming it is, so long as that is the case you only need to state that it still is what it originally is.
Technically I would bump the power down by one, but thats just me.
Just a thought or two.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ulquiorra9000 [2011-10-05 01:59:57 +0000 UTC]

I say that the rarity is just fine, and this card seems balanced -- though the blue mana seems unecessary. There's a real enchantment that turns a land you control into a 5/6 treefolk warrior and it costs 3GG or so. Blue-green likes to mess around with existing flesh, always tinkering it and making it fly, replicate, mutate, what have you

Nice illustration, too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Overlord-J [2011-10-04 21:29:16 +0000 UTC]

...
I want that card-SO MUCH!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bronzewinged [2011-10-04 20:39:55 +0000 UTC]

Nice that land just walked over the board. ^_^ That's really flavourful in some wierd way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0