HOME | DD

Mercury-Autumn β€” Octopi as a Metaphor (article)

Published: 2005-07-01 13:43:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 9004; Favourites: 191; Downloads: 157
Redirect to original
Description Octopi (belonging to the class Cephalapoda) have the ability to change colour. It is generally assumed that they do this for camouflage underwater or to make them appear less palatable to predators but this is in fact only part of the story.

Octopi are molluscs - they diverged from our own evolutionary line 700 million years ago and are related to the Escargot family (snails). Since they have no backbone they are not classified as vertebrates. However, Octupi are considered a wonderful example of parallel evolution because their optical system is very similar to the mammalian optical system. The reason for this is thought to be that they evolved in an reef environment that is as dense and rich in environmental signals and visual stimuli as is also found in the heart of a rain forest where primates and proto-hominids evolved.

An Octopus is soft bodied which means that it can not only change its colour but it can also change its outer surface texture from smooth and rubbery, to bumpy or pimply, or to rugose and ribbed, etc. And also because it is soft bodied in an aqueous environment it can fold and unfold and therefore reveal and conceal different parts of its body very, very quickly.

All of these behaviours and physiological characteristics combine together to make the Octopus an excellent visual communicator.

The colour changes, the blushes and traveling dots and bars which are manifest by Octopi are even considered a language. (For more information on this there is an excellent book called "Communication and Non Communication among the Cephalopoda" by Martin Moyniham. He even goes so far as creating a grammar for this language).

What seems to be happening is that the Octopi are wearing their minds on their skin. They are dressing themselves in their mental state.

It is believed an octopus encountering another octopus can instantly tell each other their moods, how recently they have eaten, how long it has been since they last had sex, whether they are sexually in phase, etc all just by looking at the visual information on each others skin.

It is thought the only way an octopus can have a private thought is by squirting ink into the water and by hiding inside the ink cloud. Essentially, it is believed to be some kind of correction fluid for "misspoken octopi".

Octopi seem to be using these extremely visual and in-depth forms of communication as a kind of virtual reality. In a sense this is what we ourselves are being encouraged towards in modern society. We seem to want to clothe ourselves in language. And the world we live in is a kind of virtual reality just like the spacial environment that we live in - everything present in the the rooms we live in; the fixtures, the architecture, the infrastructure, the monitor you are looking at. These are just ideas thought up by humans.

It was an idea that has then been summoned into matter, by the allotment of funds, the spending of monies and the hiring of craftsmen and designers that have them come into realisation and being.

Our civilization is based on an accreted set of interlocking ideas. We could be just like those Octopi - coral animals, naked and pulpy creatures - but instead we are clothed in denim and other fabrics, then clothed in an even harder outer shell produced and designed by Mercedes or Chevrolet, and then move about in a larger environment produced by the architectural designers of the cities we live in. I think octopi provide an excellent example of what naked mindedness is and how humans are also following this trend and have been doing so for some time.

Octopi evolved in the coastal reef domain but this is a very competitive domain, since every organism in the ocean wants to be there as its the place where all the sunlight and food is and thus attracts the most predators. This fact was probably the evolutionary driving force for some species of octupi to evolve towards inhabiting a more hostile environmental niche where there is less predation. Therefore some Octopi have become benthic or abyssal, which means that they exist in the parts of the ocean where light never reaches yet they have still managed to retain this visual communication ability by switching over to internally generated phosphorescence.

There are species of Octopi which are studded with organs that have the visual equivalent of eyelids over them but which act as phosophescent flash lights. When they descend into the abyssal depths of the ocean, all one octopus sees of another octopus is its linguistic productivity. I think that by producing a Octopi environment like this we could experience this kind of visual experience it would be a kind of proto-telepathy of sorts.

Somewhere during their evolution, Octopi instead of choosing to use verbal communication (even though water is an excellent conductor of sound), instead chose to use a totally nonverbal way to communicate.

Humans still have the remains of this primitive ability that we can use subconsciously. Studies using pairs of people were done. One person was sat in a chair across a room with their back to the other person. The second person was asked to either look at their lap or to look at the back of the other persons head. The first person was asked to record if the other person was looking at them or not. They found in certain subjects they could accurately tell if somebody else was looking at them well beyond any probability of error margin. This effect also carries over into many different fields of unexplained perceptions and phenomenons. For example, some people can instinctively tell if a particular unknown food should not be eaten, and this skill along with many other intangible perceptive skills are believed to be the imprinted basic survival skills stored in our subconscious brains inherited from a point in history where we communicated and lived in a very different way.

Glossary

rugose: Having many wrinkles or creases; ridged or wrinkled.
aqueous: Water
phosphorescence: Emission of light without burning or by very slow burning without appreciable heat, as from the slow oxidation of phosphorous: β€œHe saw the phosphorescence of the Gulf weed in the water” (Ernest Hemingway)
metatheory: A theory devised to analyze theoretical systems.
edifies: To instruct especially so as to encourage intellectual, moral, or spiritual improvement.
accreted: To make larger or greater, as by increased growth.

References

Thomas Coon: "The Structure of Scientific Revolution"
Martin Moyniham: "Communication and Non Communication among the Cephalopoda"
Terence McKenna: "Food of the Gods"
Related content
Comments: 45

XavierFeildern [2010-02-15 00:45:11 +0000 UTC]

Okay wow. I just found out this deviant passed away quite a while ago. I have no words other than that, well, that kinda sucks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

XavierFeildern [2010-02-15 00:36:58 +0000 UTC]

This is great. There should be more stuff like this on here.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Otacon144 [2010-02-08 07:01:23 +0000 UTC]

Very clever metaphor!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

craazhy [2010-02-06 04:13:31 +0000 UTC]

Very beautiful "swing". I think you tried to squeeze the message a little too much compared to letting it flow naturally and through concise terms, but that doesn't take much away from this being a great piece and in all honesty I'm really really nit picking from being on a writer's standpoint.

This whole piece reeks of Fight Club .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bedrx [2010-02-06 01:20:03 +0000 UTC]

It's not Latin, it's Greek. It should be "Octopodes."

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Agrifex [2010-02-06 00:26:51 +0000 UTC]

Stunning!
I love it when people come up with such unique, interesting thoughts and comparisons!
Being myself a fan of invertebrates, especially cephalopods, this article is difficult to resist

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Russiancrantz [2010-02-06 00:23:36 +0000 UTC]

How very thought-provoking clearly written too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

shazz-loves-blood666 [2010-02-05 23:51:01 +0000 UTC]

Brilliant work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EranFowler [2010-02-05 22:19:33 +0000 UTC]

The plural of "octopus" is "octopuses." You're thinking of the wrong latin root.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

WitchVine In reply to EranFowler [2010-02-06 07:11:57 +0000 UTC]

Um...no, it is octopi.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheAnkylosaurus In reply to EranFowler [2010-02-05 22:28:26 +0000 UTC]

... Actually, it isn't. It's "octopi."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Rabadenzo In reply to TheAnkylosaurus [2010-02-05 23:23:13 +0000 UTC]

isn't it both?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheAnkylosaurus In reply to Rabadenzo [2010-02-06 01:13:03 +0000 UTC]

Either, I think owo

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EranFowler In reply to TheAnkylosaurus [2010-02-05 22:55:10 +0000 UTC]

ocβ‹…toβ‹…pus
  /ΛˆΙ’ktΙ™pΙ™s/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [ok-tuh-puhs] Show IPA
–noun, plural -pusβ‹…es, -pi  /-ˌpaΙͺ/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [-pahy] Show IPA .
1. any octopod of the genus Octopus, having a soft, oval body and eight sucker-bearing arms, living mostly at the bottom of the sea.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

TheAnkylosaurus In reply to EranFowler [2010-02-06 01:12:51 +0000 UTC]

Notice the two options there? You kind of proved yourself a teeeeny bit wrong there. Or at least half-wrong.

"plural -pusβ‹…es, -pi  /-ˌpaΙͺ/"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

EranFowler In reply to TheAnkylosaurus [2010-02-06 01:21:06 +0000 UTC]

Indeed. My mistake. I didn't realize there was more than one option for the plural. So I guess we're both right.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheAnkylosaurus In reply to EranFowler [2010-02-06 01:53:14 +0000 UTC]

xD That works~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BaronAutumn In reply to EranFowler [2010-02-05 23:06:53 +0000 UTC]

It's octopuses and octopodes. [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

EranFowler In reply to BaronAutumn [2010-02-05 23:08:52 +0000 UTC]

I suppose it's contentious then. I'll drop it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KneelingGlory [2010-02-05 22:00:46 +0000 UTC]

That was an interesting read. I'd love to know more about the study you mentioned. Do you know what it was titled?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RedBreed [2010-02-05 20:22:31 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

E-M-Martin [2010-02-05 20:21:09 +0000 UTC]

Very interesting. I feel the urge to go read up on cephalapods (specifically octopi) now! Thanks! :+fave:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

swift-whippet [2010-02-05 19:44:15 +0000 UTC]

so very interesting - I love reading about the consciousness and communication of nonhuman creatures. I visited your front page and was saddened to discover that you're apparently no longer with us. from a relative stranger: hope you're doing fine, wherever you are.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

veronicancer [2010-02-05 19:23:29 +0000 UTC]


octopi can also improvise, teach each other, learn, and use tools better than any other wild animal. some drag coconut shells far distances underwater to live in, creating octopi tribes. in the baltimore aquarium, one octopus figured out how the escape its tank, crawl across the room, enter other tanks, eat the inhabitants, and return to its own tank before any people returned. in another experiment, an octopus figured out how to open a sealed jar of food in a matter of minutes. when it was put with other octopi with jars of food, it demonstrated how to open a jar, and the others instantly caught on. not at all poetic, like what you are saying, but still interesting facts.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WitchVine In reply to veronicancer [2010-02-06 07:17:04 +0000 UTC]

That is fucking awesome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NLY [2010-02-05 17:55:21 +0000 UTC]

The title is weak, rhetorically, and misleading in the sense that a metaphor is never actually drawn.
Nor is any actual conclusion ever really drawn.

The hint of a Point is latent in there somewhere, but it would require some astute rearranging of information, and a good grammatical work-through in a few places, for polish's sake.

As of now it is a highly interesting, even entertaining, ramble, and it's a damn shame you died before you could do anything about it.

Also - 'sup Juke?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Deceptive-Shadow [2010-02-05 17:48:04 +0000 UTC]

It's intriguing and thought provoking, while at the same time being informative. Very well done.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Minor-Seventh [2010-02-05 17:40:17 +0000 UTC]

Wow, very interesting indeed. I quite enjoyed it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ketene [2010-02-05 17:37:51 +0000 UTC]

This is really quite amazing and thought provoking, I'm glad I read it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lordstench [2010-02-05 14:05:49 +0000 UTC]

Mistakes!

Your taxonomy is weird. There is no Family Escargot, and even if they were, it would be more correct to say that cephalopods were closely related to gastropods since both Cephalopoda and Gastropoda are classes, and classes outrank families.

That's Thomas Kuhn, not "Coon"!

Also it should really be "octopuses" because it's Greek, not Latin. But nobody else cares either... sigh.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

whitekitsune555 In reply to lordstench [2010-02-20 07:03:13 +0000 UTC]

Aw, you beat me to it! *I* was going to suggest the octopuses correction on the basis of its Greek origin... I have to say, I wasn't expecting anyone to notice/care, either.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WitchVine In reply to lordstench [2010-02-06 07:14:50 +0000 UTC]

I think "family escargot" was meant to be humourous.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lhinelle In reply to lordstench [2010-02-05 17:06:38 +0000 UTC]

Mistakes aside, the author does make an interesting point while staying relatively informative. It's an enjoyable read... though now that you mention it, I did think the 'family escargot' bit sounded funny. Good catch.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Koibito5 [2010-02-05 12:51:38 +0000 UTC]

Fascinating! Funny too, as my friends and I were talking about octopi and similar topics just the other day. I think they are amazing creatures. Congrats on the DD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Forbidden93 [2010-02-05 12:16:38 +0000 UTC]

Wow..this is very well-written. I applaud you for this excellent write-up. One of the most fascinating works I've had the privilege of reading in my opinion, I enjoyed this immensely! Thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pentacle5 [2010-02-05 12:00:49 +0000 UTC]

Oh...never mind...it would appear that I am speaking to a ghost...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pentacle5 [2010-02-05 11:57:04 +0000 UTC]

Very good read! I am fascinating with alternate forms of communication amongst other species, and I want that book by Martin Moyniham!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

b-j-oshea [2010-02-05 10:48:05 +0000 UTC]

This is really thought-provoking, and it also sounds really true. I was wondering what the octopi metaphor might have been, and this makes a whole lot of sense ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cameraguyy [2010-02-05 10:14:46 +0000 UTC]

R.I.P.?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xxBluebird [2010-02-05 10:03:43 +0000 UTC]

Grats on DD!
Really sweet, sort of cute, scientific writing... nice combination, fascinating read.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lit-Twitter [2010-02-05 08:58:35 +0000 UTC]

Chirp, congrats on the DD, it's been twittered .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ants-et-octopi [2007-09-28 04:09:59 +0000 UTC]

mmm, i find it excruciatingly painful that not everybody sees the beauty in being an octopi. i personally consider myself one and have begun to live my life in a not-so-imaginary world of inkings and rugae-filled stomachs.

lovely article.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

oktopussy [2007-02-14 16:09:22 +0000 UTC]

I haven`t read it now but do fave so I can later. I like the pic!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jukas-Kayne [2005-07-02 10:49:10 +0000 UTC]

Body language accounts for a large percentage of all human communication and yet we rely almost instinctively, maybe just lazily and often very dangerously on just what people are saying verbally. Often the body language that is being presented and then what is being communicated verbally do not match up. And we are also fooled very easily with our eyes. Con-artists make a living from fooling peoples perceptions by the way they make themselves appear - by wearing uniforms, smart suits, forged name badges and official looking clothing. And of course in film-making, fooling the eyes is exactly what filmmakers strive to do with a whole arsenal of clever techniques and editing.

Italians learn from an early age to speak with their hands. Its even possible for them to understand and communicate with each other clearly without even speaking.

Perhaps in ancient times, before the introduction and reliance of highly evolved language to make verbal communication more sophisticated and "clearer" and easier to produce and understand than by reliance on visual cues, humans probably used a higher level of visual perception and acuity to understand what each other were trying to communicate through understanding of these visual cues such as hand gestures and body language in combination with their unwritten, unstandardised evolving proto-language.

I know it is possible just by a series of grunts and basic vocal sounds to convey a lot of information with a wide range of emotional subtlely about what you want or what you feel.

I think white-noise headphone generators could artificially induce "deafness" to retrain the brain into developing more visual acuity in communication by being forced to looking at the visual cues in body language more closely as a means of understanding clearly what somebody is saying.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MrIan [2005-07-02 09:55:59 +0000 UTC]

"It is thought the only way an octopus can have a private thought is by squirting ink into the water and by hiding inside the ink cloud. Essentially, it is believed to be some kind of correction fluid for "misspoken octopi"
God I wish sometimes I could do that.

Good stuff again But is it fair to compair people to Octopi? I am of the thinking that just because were people (intelegent, rule earth ,think were god chosen etc) dosent meen we have to be the best at everything Or in fact even surpriseing that we are not. Also I think body language + eye contact is very effective. I carnt remember the percentage but the amount we comunicate with each outher that isent spoken is very high. Would being able to change the colour of our skins improve our comunication skills any further? Prehaps im missing the point of the piece though. Prehaps im just not sure why you did the comparison at the end.

"The colour changes, the blushes and traveling dots and bars which are manifest by Octopi are even considered a language." Now thats intresting, have you seen/read about it being done? (prehaps flashing certain lights at the creature to try and make it react in certain manners?) (heh mate with a flash lamp >_<

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0