Comments: 10
WarriorFlashfire [2018-03-31 23:43:15 +0000 UTC]
Do you think I could have him cameo in my comics and/or (possibly) have a small role? I would, naturally, credit you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AmrasFelagund [2015-12-19 01:17:49 +0000 UTC]
Well, he's certainly much more amicable than his brother. More approachable and such. He passed some good genes on down to wee little Cassie...!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SwordSparks [2015-12-18 07:44:31 +0000 UTC]
Man, these four sound amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bobshmit13 [2015-12-18 07:43:35 +0000 UTC]
Conquest wasn't one of the 4 horsemen. I mean, it's a cool interpretation, but official 4th is pestilence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StarryOak In reply to bobshmit13 [2015-12-18 07:56:15 +0000 UTC]
Actually, that's a pop culture interpretation earliest found in 1906, and the description of the Horseman on the white horse is, and I quote; "Then I saw when the Lamb broke one of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures saying as with a voice of thunder, “Come.” I looked, and behold, a white horse, and he who sat on it had a bow; and a crown was given to him, and he went out conquering and to conquer."
Conquering, Conquest. There's no actual evidence for the interpretation of Pestilence, a duplicate of Famine, besides translations of the Bible mention "plague" or "pestilence" in connection with the riders in the passage following the introduction of the fourth rider; cf. "They were given power over a fourth of the earth to kill by sword, famine, plague, and by the wild beasts of the earth." . However, it is almost certainly referring to the four riders as a whole, pestilence not as one of the Horsemen. There's nothing connecting the white horse to Pestilence when it fairly clearly states that it came to conquer and nothing stated about pestilence when it was likely referring to the horse of Famine
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bobshmit13 In reply to StarryOak [2015-12-18 08:02:09 +0000 UTC]
Huh, that's fascinating. Thanks for the information! Never read the Bible passage myself, so I guess I just assumed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StarryOak In reply to bobshmit13 [2015-12-18 08:07:22 +0000 UTC]
The moral of the story is that pop culture doesn't always know everything.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bobshmit13 In reply to StarryOak [2015-12-18 19:04:57 +0000 UTC]
So very true, and Conquest makes a bit more sense, at least when you look at imperialism and the negative effects it can have.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0