HOME | DD

3wyl β€” Scraping Above

#urban #architecture #architecturecity #blue #fisheye #fisheyelens #futuristic #london #photograph #photography #skyscrapers #urbanandrural #urbancity #urbanstreet #architectureexterior #architecturebuilding #skyscraperbuilding #fisheyephotography
Published: 2014-08-31 17:05:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 841; Favourites: 25; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Taken in London with a fisheye lens.

I don't have much to say about this piece. As always though, I look forward to your thoughts and opinions.


Post-Processing
White Balance: Cloudy
Decreased Brightness
Increased Contrast
Increased Saturation
Related content
Comments: 76

3wyl In reply to ??? [2015-03-10 17:45:13 +0000 UTC]

I agree that it is quite interesting!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DC-26 In reply to 3wyl [2015-03-14 03:49:51 +0000 UTC]

Your use of the fisheye lens si definitely interesting - seems more about the composition of the piece than just cramming "more stuff" into the frame. Β Or a way to provide an alternate perspective / say something specific. Β Very interesting.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to DC-26 [2015-03-15 14:13:25 +0000 UTC]

I do like to think that I think about the composition of the piece, and how the fisheye effect can add more to the piece. Having said that, I am also guilty of using the fisheye just to provide an alternate perspective.

Thank you very much though!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DC-26 In reply to 3wyl [2015-03-15 19:04:00 +0000 UTC]

Alternate perspectives are also healthy!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to DC-26 [2015-03-17 18:32:06 +0000 UTC]

Yes! Perhaps not all the time, but definitely worth a consideration most of the time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DC-26 In reply to 3wyl [2015-03-18 21:31:35 +0000 UTC]

And sometimes just worthwhile to experiment with a technique, too.

Whatever the plan was here, it works for me in the end.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to DC-26 [2015-03-25 17:43:18 +0000 UTC]

That is very true. I do believe in experimenting where art is concerned. It could lead to progress.

Indeed! That sounds like a great one!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DC-26 In reply to 3wyl [2015-04-14 02:53:38 +0000 UTC]

Or if not progress, at least learning!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to DC-26 [2015-04-15 13:15:04 +0000 UTC]

I like to think we are always learning! Or, certainly, we should be?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DC-26 In reply to 3wyl [2015-04-15 21:40:05 +0000 UTC]

That is what I hope!

Most of the time, anyway....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to DC-26 [2015-04-18 13:38:24 +0000 UTC]

I can understand that!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DC-26 In reply to 3wyl [2015-04-19 01:28:45 +0000 UTC]

Some days that seems tiring, I admit - but rewarding most of the time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to DC-26 [2015-05-08 11:23:22 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I agree with you! Can't take the good without the bad.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DC-26 In reply to 3wyl [2015-05-08 11:54:36 +0000 UTC]

But when the good outweighs the bad, so much the better!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to DC-26 [2015-05-11 11:20:21 +0000 UTC]

Definitely! Those times are the good times indeed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jules-101 [2015-01-17 18:50:23 +0000 UTC]

Stunning curves created by mankind, like a ladder to the sky, with a few twists & turns thrown in

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to jules-101 [2015-01-18 13:56:59 +0000 UTC]

Indeed! I do think that mankind aims to reach for the sky with structures like these.

It'd be quite a ride to go down it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Postmorteum [2015-01-10 09:11:39 +0000 UTC]

Very trippy.

Nicely taken!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to Postmorteum [2015-01-10 14:38:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Postmorteum In reply to 3wyl [2015-04-06 00:37:04 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KiwiCocktail [2014-11-09 11:22:44 +0000 UTC]

Great shot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to KiwiCocktail [2014-11-09 14:16:19 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nihase [2014-09-24 03:52:38 +0000 UTC]

neat!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to nihase [2014-09-24 08:53:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PictureOnProgress [2014-09-11 22:30:26 +0000 UTC]

Those are some pretty imposing buildings
And the one at left looks strangely paper-thin.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to PictureOnProgress [2014-09-12 08:08:12 +0000 UTC]

Cities have a lot of skyscrapers.

Yeah, I don't think it was paper thin, but maybe the camera just captured it that way.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PictureOnProgress In reply to 3wyl [2014-09-12 22:22:42 +0000 UTC]

Mine doesn't have that many

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to PictureOnProgress [2014-09-13 09:13:38 +0000 UTC]

Is it a big city?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PictureOnProgress In reply to 3wyl [2014-09-13 21:34:56 +0000 UTC]

Somewhat.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LDFranklin [2014-09-06 14:49:35 +0000 UTC]

Very cool shot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to LDFranklin [2014-09-06 15:34:36 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AgonizingSwordfish [2014-09-05 23:54:10 +0000 UTC]

I too like the diagonal lines, it adds an exaggerated perspective and makes it seem more intense in a way. The colors in the sky are great too, it kind of shows a balance between what is nature and what's man-made

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to AgonizingSwordfish [2014-09-06 16:02:44 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I see where you are coming from!

Thank you very much! It is an interesting contrast between man and nature.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kamal-Q [2014-09-01 12:39:09 +0000 UTC]

That diagonal compositional line that is so often in your works is present here too (going from the bottom left corner to the top right) - but I think the lines going counter to it really bring this out, and give it a futuristic feel. Maybe even dystopian (with the blue tone)? Really nice use of the fish-eye yo Β 

A shot from 2011 Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to Kamal-Q [2014-09-06 16:03:29 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I think I am a big fan of that.

Indeed! I did type in futurustic in the tags.

Thank you!

Yeah, it was done using an older fisheye that I am intending to sell. I bought the newer fisheye a year or so after that.

2011 is pretty old.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamal-Q In reply to 3wyl [2014-09-06 17:29:47 +0000 UTC]

Subconsciously, what do you think it is that draws you to long sweeping diagonal lines?

I did type in futurustic in the tags.

THINK SINKS!

You haven't sold that fisheye yet?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to Kamal-Q [2014-09-09 10:54:02 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn't know what my subconscious thinks. Perhaps the long, sweeping diagonal lines carry a sense of elegance or freedom or something that is particularly attractive about it.

I haven't sold my lenses yet, no. I do want to sell them before I come to the US.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamal-Q In reply to 3wyl [2014-09-09 23:22:33 +0000 UTC]

That's why you should meditate - to draw out these subconscious drives and to understand and control them Though, I think you've hit a part of the reason there - the longer line is freer than the one confined to a short distanceΒ  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to Kamal-Q [2014-09-10 08:58:17 +0000 UTC]

No time to meditate.

What if those subconscious drives appear in my dreams?

Yes, exactly! There is a certain rollercoaster feel to it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamal-Q In reply to 3wyl [2014-09-12 15:11:26 +0000 UTC]

Psshhh have to make time to meditate I bet they do appear in your dreams

Rollercoasters, ew Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to Kamal-Q [2014-09-12 18:07:59 +0000 UTC]

Many things appear in my dreams.

You should try a virtual one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamal-Q In reply to 3wyl [2014-09-13 11:12:25 +0000 UTC]

I do wonder if getting on a virtual rollercoaster would result in the same sort of queasiness (I imagine it will) - my theory is that since I'm trying to look at everything (like the trees, the horizon, other rides in the park) I get dizzier than those that just close their eyes on the ride.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to Kamal-Q [2014-09-13 18:14:59 +0000 UTC]

Hmm.. I guess. Did you try to close your eyes, though?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamal-Q In reply to 3wyl [2014-09-14 00:31:27 +0000 UTC]

No, eyes wide open yo - it was weird - I always wanted to see everything, and I honed on details quite a distance away

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to Kamal-Q [2014-09-14 09:39:08 +0000 UTC]

Yeah.. perhaps you should try doing it with eyes closed to see if that's any better. It's a shame you didn't do that at least once.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamal-Q In reply to 3wyl [2014-09-15 15:38:48 +0000 UTC]

NEVER

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to Kamal-Q [2014-09-15 16:54:22 +0000 UTC]

You could have done it at least once!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamal-Q In reply to 3wyl [2014-09-15 23:13:00 +0000 UTC]

Done what?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

3wyl In reply to Kamal-Q [2014-09-16 07:58:24 +0000 UTC]

Blinded rollercoaster.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamal-Q In reply to 3wyl [2014-09-16 10:25:01 +0000 UTC]

I can try going blind on a 3d roller coaster

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>