Comments: 55
acritarchman [2015-09-08 15:35:36 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful work! I love the light shading over the body
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sethness [2011-08-01 15:37:40 +0000 UTC]
The link for Update 2 is not working. New link please...?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ninjerina [2010-02-19 07:24:18 +0000 UTC]
a couple of spots of lighting look off but altogether very cool! i like the soft looking back feathers
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tuomaskoivurinne [2010-02-09 05:40:31 +0000 UTC]
Very nicely created piece. Often the photo and the digital work are prominently not suitable for eachother. In this pic, the effect is very good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MugenSeiRyuu [2010-02-05 23:45:15 +0000 UTC]
Amazing work! ( See my entry on Anchiornis II for further thoughts on the subject )
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Warflight [2010-02-05 06:55:17 +0000 UTC]
FANTASTIC! I've actually been trying to keep up to date on the new discoveries of this species...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Warflight In reply to NTamura [2010-02-08 20:55:53 +0000 UTC]
No worries!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Albertonykus [2009-10-02 01:56:23 +0000 UTC]
Now that there's this "really old" eumaniraptor, the presence of an Early Jurassic therizinosauroid (Eshanosaurus deguchiianus) doesn't seem so odd now does it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to Albertonykus [2009-10-02 02:42:09 +0000 UTC]
I think it still a bit early for a therizinosaur but who knows...? A recent study by Barrett (2009) seems to really rule out the prosauropod hypothesis.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ProcrastinatingStill In reply to NTamura [2014-08-13 00:22:14 +0000 UTC]
I wouldn't be suprised if it's a prosauropod. Prosauropods have been found in China before and in the past therizinosaurs were mistaken for prosauropods.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JohnFaa [2009-09-29 16:16:38 +0000 UTC]
I already knew Jifengopteryx had good reasons for being mistaken for an Archeopteryx relative (would jifengo by any means had been able to glide or to fly?), but knowing that the passerine sized Anchironis is a troodontid only makes one wonder what would happen if these animals had taken the air instead of loosing flight...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MattMart [2009-09-28 17:36:24 +0000 UTC]
Update looks great NT! But still missing the feathers on the toes and fingers. Anchiornis-no speck unfeathered. Except the very very tip of the snout (bit farther down than you've got it).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Albertonykus [2009-09-28 01:50:27 +0000 UTC]
Eumaniraptors seem to have had long leg feathers ancestrally (think Microraptor sp. and Archaeopteryx lithographica), so a four-winged troodont isn't all that surprising. But it does do a good job of strengthening a previous theory.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KangasKid [2009-09-27 04:36:35 +0000 UTC]
Looks awesome with the new changes. Anchiornis just went from "pretty cool dino with feathers" to "amazing crested 4 winged oldest feathered dino ever with near-perfect preservation." Love it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tharos222 [2009-09-27 00:28:43 +0000 UTC]
i am now drunk but he is realy looks realystick(but how write in english
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
malevouvenator [2009-09-26 20:43:26 +0000 UTC]
Wait, this guy was described on 2008¿ I saw this on wikipedia page and it said that was first described in 2008.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to malevouvenator [2009-09-26 23:16:32 +0000 UTC]
This is an update. A second fossil has just been described...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EmperorDinobot [2009-01-16 02:34:42 +0000 UTC]
Such a strange...uh...dinosaur? archaeopterygid?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dgylia [2009-01-12 17:05:34 +0000 UTC]
Really very beautiful kind ^^ And cool work too )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dgylia In reply to NTamura [2009-01-13 11:03:38 +0000 UTC]
))))))))))
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ryivhnn [2009-01-12 00:04:02 +0000 UTC]
I love prehistoric aviens! It's so cute!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tassietyger [2009-01-11 20:31:25 +0000 UTC]
This is your best work. Did you cobine drawing and that 3D program of yours?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to tassietyger [2009-01-11 21:11:07 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. It's combining 3D and photo manip...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tassietyger In reply to NTamura [2009-01-11 21:19:25 +0000 UTC]
Oh, because the feathers look like you drew them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
avancna [2009-01-11 20:28:05 +0000 UTC]
How big was it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to avancna [2009-01-11 21:10:20 +0000 UTC]
Body itself is about 10 cm. With complete tail and neck, maybe 30-40 cm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to NTamura [2009-01-11 22:07:56 +0000 UTC]
As big as a quail?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to avancna [2009-01-12 03:15:42 +0000 UTC]
Yep!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to NTamura [2009-01-12 03:29:59 +0000 UTC]
Hmmmmmm...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to avancna [2009-01-12 03:47:14 +0000 UTC]
Longer if you count the tail ...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to NTamura [2009-01-12 04:07:06 +0000 UTC]
Cornish game hen on a string?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to avancna [2009-01-13 01:49:07 +0000 UTC]
Eh?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to NTamura [2009-01-13 03:44:20 +0000 UTC]
Trying to make a size visualization.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to avancna [2009-01-13 03:59:16 +0000 UTC]
Ah?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>