HOME | DD

Tulmur95 — F-16XL

#draken #f16 #fighter #hybrid #livingmachine #plane #saab #anthropomorphic #f16fightingfalcon #originalcharacter #pencildrawing #simplebackground
Published: 2017-11-10 10:59:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 2030; Favourites: 25; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description What happens when two aircraft of differing models fall in love? The results can be wonderful, and unanticipated.

This is Alvar Lindholm, referred to as 'Alvin' by his friends. He is roughly a 60% F-16 and 40% Saab Draken mix. His father, Waldemar, immigrated to the United States from Sweden with his family at a very young age. Being a foreign model, he stood out easily and loved nothing more than lighting his afterburner and breaking the sound barrier. As a child, Waldemar met Jayla Cartwright, an F-16C while living in Michigan. Also an adrenaline junkie by nature, the two became fast friends and did everything together. It came as no surprise that the pair fell in love and eventually married. When passions flared, their efforts were rewarded. Standing beside his wife like a steadfast soldier, they were blessed with a son.

However, they were greeted with something they did not expect. Their son was a hybrid, a rather bizarre cross. He had a basic F-16 frame and GE F110 engine, but a Saab's cranked arrow delta wing. Naming him Alvar, he too was an adreanaline junkie by nature. Early on, the United States government expressed interest in him. Agreeing to allow their son to be evaluated upon reaching the proper age, he exhibited astounding flight characteristics. None of his friends could keep pace or outmaneuver him, especially at subsonic speeds. At 15 years old and codenamed 'Bluefin' by his blue tail, he was evaluated and left his evaluators dumbstruck. Four feet longer than a normal F-16, he possessed astounding aerodynamic characteristics, including supermaneuverability and the ability to supercruise. He made even the finest F-16's look pitiful in comparison. Ultimately, the military expressed no further interest due to the cost of bringing him up to military specifications and the lack of compatibility with existing models. 
Related content
Comments: 32

BlizzardCaster [2017-11-15 12:09:58 +0000 UTC]

Is it wrong that I'm actually very fascinated with the F-16XL's?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to BlizzardCaster [2017-11-15 12:11:42 +0000 UTC]

No, there's nothing wrong with it at all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlizzardCaster In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-15 12:50:59 +0000 UTC]

Anyways, I just love experimental planes; sometimes from that category of aircraft...

I also encounter lots of interesting planes that capture my curiosity such as the EWR VJ-101 (to me, it looks like a Starfighter, but is VTOL), the Ilyushin IL-102 (The Frogfoot's competitor), the MiG 1.44 MFI (favorite MiG) and even the MiG-105 (a concept for an orbital space plane).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to BlizzardCaster [2017-11-15 15:23:14 +0000 UTC]

They're the oddballs of the aviation world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TERRAHAWK-chan1986 [2017-11-11 03:46:43 +0000 UTC]

The father of all the Falcons

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to TERRAHAWK-chan1986 [2017-11-11 04:14:25 +0000 UTC]

Basically.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TERRAHAWK-chan1986 In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-11 04:14:42 +0000 UTC]

Tru that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cartoonygothica [2017-11-11 01:47:03 +0000 UTC]

[Cool.  So, how old is he now?]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to cartoonygothica [2017-11-11 02:14:13 +0000 UTC]

The real XL first flew in 1982. I'd say he's in his 40's by now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cartoonygothica In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-11 06:10:02 +0000 UTC]

[Oh, wow.]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jojolantern2000 [2017-11-10 18:32:57 +0000 UTC]

I think he looks cute, as long as he's still a true and kind plane.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to Jojolantern2000 [2017-11-10 22:28:52 +0000 UTC]

He's functional, make no mistake.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bobblychicken [2017-11-10 17:35:52 +0000 UTC]

Holy cow this IS the best thing you've ever drawn! This is fantastic! I am a little confused though, if the F-16XL was really that good, why did the military just drop them?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to bobblychicken [2017-11-10 20:11:37 +0000 UTC]

The real F-16XL was in direct competition with the F-15E, which eventually won the Air Force contract, although many argued the XL was the better plane. With the Eagle, it utilized an existing production line and would be easy to manufacture since it was as just a modified version of the F-15 trainer. The XL needed a radically different production line and would be much more expensive to build. The money factor was probably what killed the XL.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bobblychicken In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-10 22:45:22 +0000 UTC]

Well the Strike Eagle is a sexy enough and surely capable jet but that's still such a same. It seems more and more that the powers that be in our military don't know a good thing when they see it. I miss the days when form mattered just as much as function, sparing no expense.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to bobblychicken [2017-11-11 01:01:06 +0000 UTC]

Talk about a lack of priorities at the taxpayer's expense. That's probably why the Air Force hates the A-10. It's ugly. It isn't sleek and pretty. Its like a loyal, rough and tough hillbilly. But does its job cheaper and better than any F-35 ever could. Plus, it goes 'BRRRT!!!'

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bobblychicken In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-11 01:15:19 +0000 UTC]

Ooh I don't think they're ugly at all, I absolutely adore them. They're another one of my favorites. I got to see two of them at the 2015 Reno Air Races. What's not to love about a gun with an airplane attached to it? But then again I'm pretty much like that with a lot of things that people think are ugly, especially when it comes to animals.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to bobblychicken [2017-11-11 02:57:48 +0000 UTC]

Nor do I. I think they're great. A BRRRT a day keeps the bad guys at bay.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bobblychicken In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-11 03:14:10 +0000 UTC]

Certainly. Kind of reminds me how an angry wasp sounds when it beats it's wings differently when it's in attack mode. I mean wasps are really just tiny A-10s if you think about it. They don't make honey, they don't pollinate things, they're never in a good mood. They exist solely to F everybody's day up. The only real defense against them is to avoid them and hope that you aren't on their list of things to F up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to bobblychicken [2017-11-11 03:20:05 +0000 UTC]

I've been stung on the bottom of my foot before. I hated flying things with stingers ever since. Bees, wasps, and hornets still scare me. And yes, you can only hope they don't come for you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bobblychicken In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-11 03:52:47 +0000 UTC]

I've been stung once by a bee on the hand after I saved one from drowning in the river. It certainly hurt a lot, but I was more angry that it was then going to die anyway. I like bees. Excluding African honeybees, because the African version of every animal that we have here is all roided-out and mean, honeybees are actually quite docile, even wild ones. If given the choice, they at least warn you before they're about to sting by headbutting you. Plus i just love them as a species, I find colony insects to be fascinating. They wage war, they conquer territory, they farm, some species even enslave others. They're like tiny little civilizations, way advance stuff for what they are. But wasps can go to hell. I don't agree with a lot of animals that people find gross, or ugly or bad. My favorite animals are sharks, reptiles, chickens, pigeons, and rats, but I can agree on wasps. I was stung by one of the big black ones on the leg when I was a little kid. Literally just flew up and stung me. It felt like I'd been shot. It's left a small patch of skin where it stung me discolored to this day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to bobblychicken [2017-11-11 04:14:14 +0000 UTC]

It's odd how every animal species from the African continent is much more agreesive. It's a vast, wild place. As for bees, it really is amazing how complex their colony structure is. Every bee plays a role, none of them sit one out. In a number of ways, both good and bad, they're just like us. I think sharks are deserving of more respect, as are reptiles. Look no further than Carlo. But pigeons and rats? I don't like rats, and pigeons are basically the same thing with wings. They carry diseases and ruin structures to name a few things. And wasps? They can go do something inappropriate to themselves.

I think I have another idea for a prototype character. One that is fast and a tad unconventional.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bobblychicken In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-11 04:34:19 +0000 UTC]

Oh but both those animals, the rats and pigeons, are so much more than that. Only those displaced, living unnaturally in cities really carry diseases. I had a rat when I was a kid and I loved her. She was such a sweet thing. I would take her to school with me and she would sleep in the front pocket of my sweater and I could reach down and pet her when I felt an anxiety attack coming. Smart as hell too. Then there's pigeons. Also very smart and their flying ability is such that it's almost more mechanical in nature. There is literally nothing faster or more maneuverable or has more stamina than a pigeon; falcons are only faster while in a dive. Also they have huge emotional depth, often mating for life, and make great pets who love to be cuddled and scratched. I've always wanted a pet pigeon, especially after I read the book "Wringer" in grade school. I've been around lots of chickens, two of which were pets that would come when called to jump up on my lap and preen my hair. I would carry both of them around like little babies in my arm on their backs and they just relished in it. Every see that video of the little boy hugging the chicken? Their social structure and behavior is very rich and they almost have the rudiments of language with the variety of sounds they make. I could watch them foraging all day. The roosters take such good care of their hens, calling alarm calls telling them to hide while staying out in the open until the danger passes or to meet it, and every time he'd find something special to eat, he'd let the hens eat it. I remember getting frustrated when I was little trying to give him treats and he would make that, "I found good food" sharp clucking and the hens would come running over. He would never take anything from me.

Anyway sorry for the huge wall of rambling text, what of this fast and unconventional prototype? As you can tell, I like things that are fast and unconventional.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to bobblychicken [2017-11-11 04:49:29 +0000 UTC]

No need to apologize. I knew rats and pigeons were smart, but I didn't know so much about chickens. I don't mind them at all, but I've never given their social structure any thought. I should've phrased it differently, it isn't a prototype. In terms of this unusual model, what it is will be revealed in time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bobblychicken In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-11 05:04:56 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I just tend to get pretty passionate about these animals and always jump in to defend them. I don't know I just have a natural affinity toward the unloved and unappreciated animals. That's why Steve Irwin was such a hero to me. So many people think these animals are worthless, ugly, dirty, lowly, and stupid. There's so much more to them if you just give them a chance. I wasn't ever given any chances either or have anyone love or appreciate or defend me. I guess I figured that someone had to love those animals. Might as well be me.

Ah, very well. I look forward to seeing it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hindenburg19890 [2017-11-10 13:13:24 +0000 UTC]

They are a common sight in Strangereal,though. Both born and built! One of the most bizarre,though interesting,designed jets I've seen!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to Hindenburg19890 [2017-11-10 14:24:58 +0000 UTC]

In real life, they only made two of these. They took a pair of F-16's straight from the production line and modified them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hindenburg19890 In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-10 15:25:03 +0000 UTC]

Very queer aircraft,aren't they?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to Hindenburg19890 [2017-11-10 15:26:51 +0000 UTC]

They are.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hindenburg19890 In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-10 15:36:35 +0000 UTC]

Though I still think the F-107 is another queer jet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tulmur95 In reply to Hindenburg19890 [2017-11-10 16:43:59 +0000 UTC]

It's unorthodox, that's for certain.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hindenburg19890 In reply to Tulmur95 [2017-11-10 16:50:40 +0000 UTC]

Yep!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0